Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11571 (AP)

V MUNASWAMY v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/85/2022 · 2026-09-18

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010526412021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 85/2022 Between: 1. V MUNASWAMY, , S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCCUPATION - WRO(UNDER SUSPENSION), 0/O TAHSILDAR SATHYAVEDU MANDAL, MADANAMBEDU VILLAGE, SATHYAVEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, 3. THE TAHSILDAR, , SATHYAVEDU MANDAL, SATHYAVEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction or Writ, more appropriately a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2n't respondent, the District Collector, Chittoor, in not reviewing the suspension order of the petitioner vide Roc.A/8/e-306036/2020 dt.30.03.2021 within 6 months, as per the G.O.Ms.No.86 dt.08.03.1994, and not paying the arrears of the salary from the date of surrender till the date of suspension i.e, 2 from 28.08.2020 to 30.03.2021, and also not considering the representations made by the petitioner dt.7.08.2021 and 16.12.2021 till date, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and set aside the same and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents herein to pay the arrears of salary from 28.08.2020 to 30.03.2021, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned suspension order passed by the 2nd respondent vide Roc.A/8/e-306036/2020 dt.30.03.2021, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.85 OF 2022 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.09.2026 KBN 4 33 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.85 of 2022 Date: 19.09.2026 KBN