Page No. 1/2 GAHC010018222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/507/2026 BODO ALI SON OF LATE JOYNAL ALI VILL- BHELLA, P.S. BARPETA, P.O. BHELLA, P.S. BARPETA, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781309. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PWDR DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOV.T OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DM (GEN) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWRD CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3. 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWRD BARPETA- BAGHBOR- CHENGA TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION BARPETA PIN-781301 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J AHMED, R BEGUM,H G DAISY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, SC, REVENUE Page No. 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 04.02.2026 Mr. J. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. M. Bhuyan, learned counsel representing Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, PWDR Department for the respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4; and Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 2 are present. Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inadvertently, the District Commissioner, Barpeta has not been made a party-respondent in this writ petition As the District Commissioner, Barpeta is a necessary party, Mr. Ahmed has submitted that the writ petition may be allowed to be withdrawn in order to file afresh. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty to file afresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant