Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11561 (AP)

Dokkara Pentamma v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/27564/2026 · 2026-09-27

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010506962026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27564/2026 Between: 1. DOKKARA PENTAMMA,, W/O. LATE VASANTALU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE RIO. D.NO.2-35, TUNGATAMPARA VILLAGE, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT - 532459. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GOLLAPUDI VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521225 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT - 532001 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT - 532001 5. THE TAHSILDAR, HIRAMANDAL MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT - 532459. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking on my representations including dt 15.6.2026 in order to mutate my name in Sy.No. 248-2B (L.P.No 1780) to an extent of Ac 0.33 cents situated at Gulumuru Village, Hiramandalam Mandal, Srikakulam District and residential House situated at Dr.No 2-35, Tungatampara Village, Hiramandalam Mandal, Srikakulam District is bad, arbitrary, and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and also offends Arts. 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents to mutate my name in in Sy.No. 248-26 (L.P.No 1780) to an extent of Ac 0.33 cents situated at Gulumuru Village, Hiramandalam Mandal, Srikakulam District and residential House situated at Dr.No 2-35, Tungatampara Village, Hiramandalam Mandal, Srikakulam District, in order to protect my life and property, in the interests of justice and fair play Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M VIDYAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, with a liberty to approach the appropriate authority. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD