Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11559 (PNJ)

SURAJ v. U.T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRM-M/61659/2025 · 2026-01-15

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH              Date of decision: 15th January, 2026 Suraj ...Petitioner Versus U.T., Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arav Gupta, APP, U.T., Chandigarh. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- Learned counsel for U.T., Chandigarh submits that an FIR has been registered against the respondent No.3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Since the main case has already been disposed of, pending application if any is rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 15th January, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.01.16 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document