HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15857 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Sri R.K. Singh Rajput, Advocate on behalf of petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The preliminary objection has been raised by the learned Standing Counsel that the impugned order dated 03.09.2026 has been passed by a private limited company, i.e. M/s Nirmal Facility Management Service Private Limited, and as such, the present writ petition is not maintainable against the same. 3. Counsel for the petitioner, being confronted with the aforesaid proposition as to whether a writ petition can be said to be maintainable against a private service provider, does not dispute that the writ petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. In view of the aforesaid, no relief can be granted and the present writ petition is dismissed as being not maintainable. 5. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to avail of, such civil remedy as may be available under law. 6. No order as to costs. September 29, 2026 piyush Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.K. Singh Rajput Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Mrs Meena .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad