Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11555 (PNJ)

INAMUL HAQ v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/39505/2025 · 2026-02-18

Harsh Bunger

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APURVA 2026.02.20 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh 4. Upon perusal of the paper book, it is apparent that the petitioner is seeking a roving enquiry into the affairs of the Gram Panchayat, without placing on record any material particulars or supporting documents to substantiate the allegations made therein. 5. In “Ashok Kumar Pandey v. State of W.B.” 2004(3) SCC 349, the Hon’ble Apex Court held that petition seeking to make a roving enquiry on speculative foundations and premises, cannot be entertained. 6. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed. 7. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. APURVA 2026.02.20 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh