Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11555 (HP)

GENERAL MANAGER NORTHERN RAILWAYS v. MITHU RAM AND ORS

CMP/12853/2026 · 2026-06-05

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

GM, Northern Railway Vs. Mithu Ram & Ors. CMP No. 12853/2026 in RFA No. 344/2016 05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Prashant Manhans, Advocate, vice Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents/State. The present application under Order 1, Rule 10 (2), read with Section 151 CPC has been filed by the applicant for substitution of the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 2, Ashok Kumar in his place. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of one of the applicants namely Dalbeero, death certificate of the deceased as well as legal heirs certificate. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has no objection in case the same is allowed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, the same is allowed and the applicants, as mentioned in para-3 of the application, are substituted as party respondents in the present proceedings in place of deceased respondent No. 2. The application stands disposed of. Let amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks. List thereafter. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 5th June, 2026 (raman)