Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010098802026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/347/2026 CHANDRAMA SINGH S/O LATE BALISTER SINGH, R/O B.G. ROAD, WARD NO. 11 , P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS SMTI SUNITA DEVI SINGH W/O SRI NARAYAN SINGH, R/O B.G. ROAD , WARD NO. 11, P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MR A AHMED,U U KHAN,MR. M A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 31.07.2026 Heard Mr. A Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 2, Sivasagar in T.S. No.16/2020. 3. I have considered the submissions made by Mr. Ahmed. I have also gone through the orders and the applications filed, which is available in the record. 4. This Court is of the opinion that the learned Trial Court has misconstrued the pleadings Page No.# 2/2 of the parties. 5. Therefore, the impugned order dated 20.02.2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 2, Sivasagar in T.S. No.16/2020 is bad in law and is set aside accordingly. 6. The Trial Court is directed to accept the cost of Rs.2000/- to be paid by the petitioner and thereafter the petitioner shall be given the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses of the plaintiff side. With the aforesaid direction the instant revision petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant