Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11553 (ALL)

KRISHNA KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/9837/2026 · 2026-09-28

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9837 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. The learned A.G.A. has pointed out that the applicant has criminal history of two other cases, which has not been explained in the affidavit accompanying the present anticipatory bail application, as required under Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. 2. On being confronted with this fact, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with the liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application after disclosing the complete criminal antecedents of the applicant, as required under Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the above mentioned liberty. 4. Office is directed to return the certified copy, if any, filed along with the bail application to the counsel for the applicant. September 29, 2026 Junaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alka, Rakesh Kumar Rathore, Rekha Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Krishna Kumar Shukla .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad