Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11552 (CAL)

KUTUMUDDIN SK @ KUTUMUDDIN SHAIKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/4145/2025 · 2026-01-06

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 40 January 6, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 4145 of 2025 An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Raghunathganj P.S. Case No.1569 of 2024 dated 04.12.2024 under Sections 303(2)/317(2)/317(4)/61(2) of the BNS and Section 12(a)(1) of the Indian Passport Act, 1967. And In the matter of: Kutumuddin Sk.@ Kutumuddin Shaikh … petitioner Mr. Usof Ali Dewan Mr. Asif Dewan Mr. Mehedi Masud … for the petitioner Ms. Anasuya Sinha, ld. APP Mr. Sachit Talukdar … for the State Report filed by the State is taken on record. As per report, the petitioner has not been charge-sheeted by the Investigating Agency in Raghunathganj PS Charge- Sheet No.833/25 dated 30.06.2025. However, it does not appear that the charge-sheet has been submitted and cognizance has been taken only in respect of the charge- sheeted accused and not against the present petitioner. Since the charge-sheet does not mention the petitioner as an accused, there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the present case. Therefore, the application for anticipatory bail is disposed of as having become infructuous. 2 In the event the petitioner is made an accused in the instant case at a subsequent stage, he shall be at liberty to pray for anticipatory bail. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)