CRWP No.2539
IN TH 138 Manika and State of Pun CORAM: Present: SUMEET G 1. necessary di to them ar petitioners c copies of th of birth of t of the petitio 2. not a must because pro highest ped co-ordinate of Punjab 539 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ***** and another v. of Punjab and others AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SU Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate --- EET GOEL, J. (Oral) The petitioners have approach sary directions for protecting their life em are at stake because they are i ners claim themselves to be major in t s of the Aadhar Cards (Annexure P-1 th of the petitioner No.1-Manika is 18 petitioner No.2-Mohmad Rafiq Dar Learned counsel for the petitio must for providing security to a cou se protection qua life and liberty is st pedestal. He has also placed relian dinate Bench of this Court in ‘Sarabje jab and others’ in CRWP-102- -1-
UNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP No.2539 of 2026 Date of decision: 7.3.2026 Date of uploading : 7.3.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents CE SUMEET GOEL ocate for the petitioners proached this Court for issuance of eir life and liberties which according are in a live-in-relationship. The jor in terms of age. According to the 1 and P-2 respectively), the date 18.10.1999 and the date of birth is 16.11.1991. petitioners submits that a marriage is a couple in a ‘live-in-relationship’ rty is sacrosanct and stands at the reliance upon orders passed by the rabjeet Kaur and another v. State -2022 decided on 07.01.2022;
2026 2026 2026 ce of rding The o the date birth ge is ship’ t the y the tate 022; ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.03.07 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.2539
‘Goutam K 8088-2021 Chandigarh CRWP-1106 3. respondents 4. Senior DAG 5. the case as petitioners; to look into stated to ha (Annexure from today. 6. in any othe authority fro 7. 7.3.2026 Ashwanii 539 of 2026 m Kumar and another v. State of P 021 decided on 26.08.2021; Bharti igarh & others and ‘Annu Rani & 11060-2023 decided on 15.11.2023. Notice of motion to respond ndents). On the asking of the Court, r DAG, Punjab accepts notice on beha At this stage, without expressin se as well as on the age and nature o ners; I deem it appropriate to direct r k into the matter and pass an appropri to have been filed by the petitioners xure P-3) & pass appropriate orders oday. However, if the petitioners are y other case, then this order shall rity from taking lawful action against t The petition stands disposed of Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2-
of Punjab and others’ in CRWP- arti and Another v. State of U.T., i & Anr. v. State of Haryana’ in .2023. espondent Nos.1 to 3 (i.e. official ourt, Mr. Gaurav Gurcharan S. Rai, n behalf of the official respondents. pressing any opinion on the merits of ature of the relationship between the ect respondent No.2 –SSP, Mohali propriate order on the representation tioners before him/her on 26.2.2026 orders thereupon within two weeks ers are found to have been involved shall not preclude the competent ainst the petitioners. sed of. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
- .T., in ficial Rai, its of n the ohali ation 2026 eeks lved etent ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.03.07 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document