APHC010207372013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 21422/2013 Between: 1. KAMINEDI SIVA NAGESWARAMMA, W/O. MAHESWARA RAO,, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. GADDIPATI SUBBAYAMMA, W/O.SAMBASIVA RAO,, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. GOVADA, AMRUTHALURU MANDAL, GUNTUR: DISTRICT; ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE (ULC) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SPECIAL OFFICER REVENUE ULC, DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more fully one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in U.L.C.No.969/76 on the file of 2nd respondent shall be deemed to have been abated under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Repeal. Act 1999 as the proceedings under Urban Land(Ceiling & Regulation) Act 1976 were pending immediately prior to commencement of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act 1999 and consequently direct the respondents herein to restore the excess land of an 2 VS,J W.P.No.21422 of 2013 extent of 11981.66 sq.meters in S.No.1169/C situated in Guntur Municipality declared in U.L.C.No.969/76 on the file of 2nd respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 26216 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitiOners from the land of an extent of 0-27 cents situated in D.No.1169 declared in ULC 969/76 of Guntur Municipality pending disposal of the above Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Kaminedi Siva Nageswaramma 2. Gaddipati Subbayamma Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.21422 of 2013 ORDER: On 08.09.2026, it was brought to the notice of this Court that learned counsel for the petitioners on record has given up his vakalath, as such, Registry was directed to print the names of the petitioners in the cause list and the matter was adjourned to 15.09.2026. When the matter came up for hearing on 15.09.2026, with the petitioners’ names printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf. As such, the matter was directed to be posted to 22.09.2026, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 22.09.2026 Gss