Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11545 (DEL)

YANISH KUMAR v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/8899/2026 · 2026-07-09

Tejas Karia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8899/2026 YANISH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-Person. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shiven Varma, Panel Counsel (Civil) with Mr. Rudraksh Mathur, Advocate for Respondent No.1/GNCTD. Mr. Tushar Sannu & Mr. Pulak Gupta Joshi, Advocates for Respondent No.2/MCD along with Mr. Aniket from Health Department. Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC along with, Mr. Akash Chandrayan, G.P., Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Ms. Anamika Thakur & Mr. Abhinav Verma, Advocates for Respondent No.3/Union of India. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 09.07.2026 1. Heard the Petitioner who appears in person and Mr. Shiven Varma, learned Panel Counsel (Civil) representing Respondent No. 1 – GNCTD, Mr. Tushar Sannu, learned Counsel representing Respondent No. 2 – Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Dr. Monika Arora, learned CGSC representing Respondent No. 3 – Union of India. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:59:56 2. Having regard to the nature of grievances raised in this Petition, we are of the opinion that such grievances can be better attended to on the administrative side by the authorities concerned. 3. Accordingly, we permit the Petitioner to raise the grievances with Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 by making an exhaustive representation taking all the pleas which may be available to him and enclosing therewith all the documents on which he intends to rely upon. The said representation may be made within a fortnight and once any such representation is received, the appropriate authorities of Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 shall attend to the said representation and take an appropriate decision which may be warranted under law, with expedition, preferably within a period of two months from the date any such representation is received. 4. The decision which may be taken on the representation to be preferred by the Petitioner under this order shall also be communicated to him. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J JULY 9, 2026/ ‘A’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:59:56