Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11544 (GAU)

THE PRINCIPAL GURU CHARAN COLLEGE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2456/2026 · 2026-07-29

Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010153802026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2456/2026 THE PRINCIPAL GURU CHARAN COLLEGE SILCHAR PO SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 788004 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM EDUCATION HIGHER DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 2:THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 781019 3:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 781019 4:DR NANDITA PAUL DAUGHTER OF LATE BINANDA PAUL VILLAGE AND PO KABUGANJ DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 78812 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA, MR. SIDHANT DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, DR G J SHARMA,MR S NATH Linked Case : WP(C)/3242/2024 DR NANDITA PAUL DAUGHTER OF LATE BINANDA PAUL Page No.# 2/4 VILL. AND P.O.- KABUGANJ DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788121. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM EDUCATION (HIGHER) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI PIN- 781019. 3:THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI PIN- 781019. 4:THE PRINCIPAL GURU CHARAN COLLEGE SILCHAR P.O.- SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788004. ------------ Advocate for : MR S NATH Advocate for : SC HIGHER EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR O R D E R 30.07.2026 Mr. Sishir Dutta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that he has received appropriate reports from the respondent No.4, that is the Principal of college, to show that each of the candidates, whose applications were found to be in order, had been called for the interview by sending them intimation under registered post at the addresses given in the applications. He, therefore, submits that the college had made efforts to inform all the eligible candidates and thereafter, the interview was properly undertaken. Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned Standing Counsel for the Higher Education Department has submitted that when the question was raised before the college authorities during the inquiry, the college authorities failed to produce this records and therefore, the Director of Higher Education had required a re- advertisement for the post. Giving an give an opportunity to Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned counsel appearing for the Director of Higher Education Department to present the instructions on behalf of the college before the Director of Higher Education, I deem it fit to allow the respondent no.4 to bring on record, the documents produced today, by way of an affidavit, within a period of 10(ten) days from today. Page No.# 4/4 Accordingly, list this matter again on 18.08.2026. Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned Standing Counsel has assured that he would make endeavour to have instructions in the matter so that the matter can be taken up for disposal, on the next day fixed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant