Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11541 (CHH)

VIKAS SWA SAHAYATA SAMUH CELL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3687/2021 · 2026-04-20

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18011 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3687 of 2021 Vikas Swa Sahayata Samuh Cell Through Secretary, Agar Bai, W/o Ramcharan, Aged About 51 Years, Village- Katgi, Block- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Ministry Of Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atalnagar, Post Office- Rakhi, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atalnagar, Post Office- Rakhi, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Programme Officer Women And Child Development Department, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub- Divisional Officer Tehsil- Bilaigarh, District- Balodabazar - Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Vinamra Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Alok Kumar Dubey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 21.04.2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following relief(s):- “10.1 A writ and/or an order in the nature of MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.04.21 17:00:35 +0530 2 setting aside the impugned provisional list dated 06.08.21 directing the respondent no. 03 to issue a fresh provisional list after properly evaluating marks given to the petitioner, in the interest of the Justice. 10.2 To direct the respondent authorities to make new appointment only after expiration of petitioner's tenureas per the agreement. 10.3 Cost of the proceedings. 10.4 Any other writs and directions that may be deemed fit and just in the facts & circumstances of case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State having no objection. 4. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh