Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11537 (AP)

Vissarapu Ramu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/1124/2026 · 2026-09-29

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010507702026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1124/2026 Between: 1. VISSARAPU RAMU, S/O RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,R/O D.NO23-10-42,AZEEMBAD,GAJUWAKA VISAKHAPATNAM 530026. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATI. 2. YADAGIRI TIRUMALA RAO, S/O LATE CHINNAM NAIDU,HINDU ,AGED ABOUT 54 YEARSR/O .D.NO37-12-20/2/1,SVMS SOUDHA,FLAT NO FF1 ,KAPPARADA,NGGOS COLONY,VISAKHAPATNAM,530007 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present. Smt. D.Madhavi, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report. In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Special Magistrate Court VI At Visakhapatnam, in C.C.No.175 of 2017, dated 30.01.2019, as confirmed in Crl.A.No.93 of 2019, dated 23.02.2026, by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, are set aside, as a result, the Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 30.09.2026 VTS