M/S GURUDEV AUTO MOBILES THROUGH ITS PROPRITOR DINESH KUMAR RAJPOOT v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/4641/2026 · 2026-09-28
Subhash Chandra Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11536 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11536 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4641 of 2026 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to allow this application and direct the learned trial court to expedite the trial of Complaint No. 22 of 2024 ( M / s Gurudev Auto Mobiles vs. M/s Krishna Infra Solutions Pvt. Ltd.) U/s 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Kotwali Orai, District Jalaun, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun At Orai, within stipulated time period. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that he is complainant and filed a complaint under Section 138 N.I. Act is pending before the learned court from the year 2024 but it has not been decided till now, therefore, request to direct the learned trial court to proceed with the case and decide the case expeditiously within a stipulated period of time. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by learned counsel for applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perusal of record, the order sheet of the case, it appears that after summoning order the accused has appeared before the learned court on an application under Section 143(1) on the part of complainant filed before the learned court that is pending for hearing for disposal. In the circumstances of the case, keeping in view large number of cases pending before the learned trial court it cannot be directed to decide the case within a stipulated period of time unless there are exceptional circumstances those are lacking in the present case. However, it is expedient to direct the learned trial court to proceed with the case, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, without granting Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunit Kumar, Yatish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. M/S Gurudev Auto Mobiles Through Its Propritor Dinesh Kumar Rajpoot .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. With the aforesaid directions, the present application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. stands disposed of finally.
September 29, 2026 Suraj Srivastav NA529 No. 4641 of 2026 2 (Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad