Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11535 (CHH)

SANMAT MOURYA v. SHRI DR. S. BHARATHIDASAN

CONT/160/2026 · 2026-03-26

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:14674 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 160 of 2026 1. Sanmat Mourya S/o Shri Somaru Mourya Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Chitalanka Professor Colony Chitalanka Quarter No. 07, Post Chitalanka, Block - Dantewada, District - Dantewada, (C.G.), Presently Posted At Govt. Mahendra Karma Girls College Dantewada (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. Shri Dr. S. Bharathidasan Ias Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Dr. Santosh Kumar Dewangan Ias Director, Higher Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Aniruddh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Yash Karan Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 27/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondents submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, which is subject matter of this SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.04.01 10:46:44 +0530 2 contempt petition, the petitioner has been confirmed in service w.e.f. 21.2.2015 and sanction has been granted to make payment of arrears of salary to him. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that according to instruction received by him, till date arrears of pay has not been disbursed in favour of petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for respondents submits that the order is issued only on 11.3.2026 and when once the order is issued, arrears of pay will be disbursed in the account of petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that liberty may be reserved to petitioner to file appropriate proceeding for non- grant of time pay-scale. 5. On due consideration of submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the considered opinion of this Court, the contempt has been purged by respondents, therefore, contempt proceeding initiated against respondents is dropped and contempt notice stands discharged. 6. The contempt petition is closed. 7. However, petitioner will be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings against grievance of non-grant of time pay-scale. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-