DHIRAJ KUMAR MAHTO @ DHIRAJ KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(SJ)/75/2025 · 2026-01-22
Sanjay Prasad
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11530 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11530 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:1772
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J) No. 75 of 2025
1.Dhiraj Kumar Mahto @ Dhiraj Kumar, aged about 34 years, son of Baiju Mahato 2.Sanny Kumar Mahto @ Sanny Kumar, aged about 26 years, son of Baiju Mahato 3.Shivje Kumar Mahto @ Shivjee, aged about 23 years, son of Rajkumar Mahto No.1 to 3 are residents of Maharajpur, Nayatola Kalyani, P.O & P.S-Taljhari, District-Sahibganj 4.Shibu Kumar Mahto @ Sibu, aged about 28 years, son of Rajesh Noniya, resident of Babupur, Tinpahar, P.O & P.S-Tinpahar, District-Sahibganj
…… Appellants
Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Rusni Devi, wife of Umesh Ravidas, resident of Maharajpur, Nayatola Kalyani, P.O & P.S-Taljhari, District Sahibganj
……. Respondents
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Appellants : Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, APP
----------- 11/Dated:22nd January, 2026
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this Criminal Appeal in view of the fact that process under section 82 Cr.P.C has been issued against them and seeks permission to file appeal at the appropriate stage.
2. No objection has been raised by the learned APP.
3. Under the circumstances, learned counsel for the appellants is permitted to withdraw this Criminal Appeal with liberty to take fresh steps in future, if situation arise.
4. Thus, Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.75 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated: 22.01.2026 Saket/-