Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11523 (HP)

RAMI CHAND v. NIPUN JINDAL AND OTHERS

COPC/724/2026 · 2026-06-04

Romesh Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:22008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 724 of 2026 Decided on: 04.06.2026 Rami Chand ….Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal & others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No.18272 of 2025, dated 26.11.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record communication dated 21.05.2026, as addressed by the Regional Manager, HRTC, Palampur to the Financial Advisor-cum-CAO, HRTC, Shimla. As per the same, DCRG to the tune of Rs. 5,34,417/-, interest on DCRG Rs.33,049/- along with leave encashment of Rs. 5,48,120/- 2 and interest on leave encashment of Rs. 33,897/- has been paid to the petitioner. He further submits that the arrears of Rs. 66,946/- are yet to be paid by the respondents, which shall be paid within eight weeks from today. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the above mentioned facts. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the petition in case any of his grievances still remains unaddressed. (Romesh Verma) Judge 4th June, 2026. (kck)