APHC010576742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 29736/2025 Between: 1. BUDDASETTY VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. BUDDASETTY NARASIMHULU, H.NO.5-22, ALAMUR VILLAGE, RUDRAVARAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, RUDRAVARAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. MANDAL SURVEYOR, RUDRAVARAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6. VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, ALAMUR VILLAGE, RUDRAVARAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 7. VILLAGE SURVEYOR, ALAMUR VILLAGE, RUDRAVARAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 8. P THEJOMAYE, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O. LATE P.PRASAD, D.NO. 1-3-16 RAMADASU STREET, ALLAGADDA, NANDYAL DISTRICT. Page 2 of 5 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 4 to 7 in interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession of the subject land admeasuring Ac. 1.55 cents in Sy.No.367 of Alamur Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Nandyal District at the behest of the 8th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and without due process of law, violative of Article 14, 21, 300-A of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct Respondents Nos.4 to 8 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners property admeasuring Ac.1.55 cents in Sy.No.367 of Alamur Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Nandyal District, except in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.4 to 7 not to interfere with the possession of the Petitioners property admeasuring Ac.1.55 cents in Sy.No.367 of Alamur Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Nandyal District, pending Writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA The Court made the following order: Heard Sri Thathireddy Ashok Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Chandra Sekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 7. The notice in respect of the 8th respondent is dispensed with since no adverse order has been passed affecting her rights or interests. Page 3 of 5 2. The above writ petition is filed complaining that respondents 4 to 7 are interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over an extent of Ac.1.55 cents in Sy.No.367, Alamur Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Nandyal District, at the behest of the 8th respondent, without issuing any notice, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of Ac. 1.55 cents in Sy.No.367 of Alamur Village. The Petitioner’s name was updated in the Record of Rights. The said property is an ancestral property. 4. Be that as it may, respondents 4 to 7, at the behest of the 8th respondent, are trying to dispossess the petitioner. 5. Sri Chandra Sekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, submitted the instructions of the 4th respondent and would submit that the 8th respondent made an application in PGRS dated 29.09.2025 to mutate her name in the online revenue records. The 8th respondent also filed W.P.No.27144 of 2025 to survey the land in Sy.No.367. The said writ petition was disposed of. A notice was issued; however, the survey could not be conducted due to heavy rains. Thereafter, another notice was issued. However, the petitioner requested postponement of the survey on 31.10.2025 and requested that the survey be conducted after 20.11.2025. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the authorities are not interfering with the aforementioned extent of land. 6. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing the respondents not to interfere with an extent of Ac.1.55 cents in Sy. No.367, Alamur Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Nandyal, without following due procedure. If the 4th respondent intends to proceed with the survey, the petitioner shall cooperate with the same. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 21.09.2026 SNI 144 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 29736 OF 2026 Date: 21.09.2026 SNI