Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11519 (AP)

TADI GANAPATHI SUBBARAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/41315/2022 · 2026-09-20

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010699792022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 41315/2022 Between: 1. TADI GANAPATHI SUBBARAO, S/O TADISRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 51 YEARS, OCC SCHOOL ASSISTANT, R/O D. NO. 5-5-12/2, IBRAHIM STREET, SURYARAOPETA, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, TULLURU, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT YOUTH ADVANCEMENT TOURISM AND CULTURE DEPARTMENT, TULLURU, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH B-BLOCK, 4TH FLOOR, SRI ANJANEYA TOWERS N.T.T.P.S ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA - 521456, KRISHNA DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 4. NATIONAL CADET CORPS, REP BY ITS DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF NCC GENERAL CHOUDHARY RD, NCC GROUND, GUNROCK ENCLAVE, SECUNDERABAD TELANGANA 500003 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing G.O. Ms. No.187, School Education (Ser-2) Dept., dated 10.12.2022 and the consequential proceedings of the 2nd Respondent Commissioner of even dates whereby and where under the services of the Petitioner is sought to be transferred by showing the posts as vacant against the post of the Petitioner, without any reason or basis as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice besides being in contravention of earlier G.O. Rt. No.278, dated 21.04.2001 and also that of the year 2005 by giving a go bye to the guidelines to be adhered for the special category Institutions where Central Government is the functioning authority and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to conduct offline counseling to ANO's (Associate NCC Officers), in terms of G.O.Rt.No.278, dated 21.04.2001 and consequential memo issued by the 1st Respondent vide No. 14825/SE Ser.IV-2/2005-3, dated 18-10-2005 and issue such IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to conduct offline counseling to ANO's (Associate NCC Officers), in terms of G.O.Rt.No.278, dated 21.04.2001 and consequential memo issued by the 1st Respondent vide No. 14825/ SE:Ser.IV-2/2005-3, dated: 18-10-2005, pending Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.41315 OF 2022 ORDER: Ms.Gandham Kusuma Papa, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 21.09.2026 KBN 4 16 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.41315 of 2022 Date: 21.09.2026 KBN