Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11516 (JHR)

DHALU KUMAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6216/2025 · 2026-04-21

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:11637 ) --1-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6216 of 2025 ---- Dhalu Kumar Paswan, aged about 28 years, son of Angrej Paswan, resident of Village Nawadih, PO & P.S Chakai, District Jamui, Bihar-811303 .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Amrita Kumari, APP ---- 02/21.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Deori P.S Case No. 295 of 2020 for the alleged offences registered under Section395, 397, 412,34 of the IPC and 25(1-b)a/26/35 of Arms Act pending in the Court of learned C.J.M Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, and the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused, and in view of that the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner may kindly be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner happens to be the driver of the Omni car which was used in the crime. ( 2026:JHHC:11637 ) --2-- 5. The owner of the said Omni car has stated that the said Omni car was in the custody of this petitioner on the fateful day when the incident took place, in the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, and hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, is hereby, rejected. 21.04.2026 (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Abha/