Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11513 (JHR)

GOPAL HADI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/456/2025 · 2026-01-16

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1216 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 456 of 2025 -- Gopal Hadi, aged about 53 years, son of Late Mahangi Hadi, resident of Village Singh Nagar, Phusro, P.O. Phusro, P.S. Bermo, District - Bokaro (Jharkhand) ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Nilendu Kumar Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Central Coalfields Ltd., having its office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, P.O. District Ranchi. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, 3. Sri Harsh Nath Mishra, son of not known to the petitioner, the Director (Personnel), Central Coalfields Ltd. having its office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District - Ranchi 4. Sri Navnit Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, the General Manager (P & IR), Central Coalfields Ltd. having its office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S. –Kotwali, District Ranchiلا 5. Sri Ranjay Kumar Sinha, son of not known to the petitioner, Project Officer, Dhori (Khas) Colliery, Dhori Area, Central Coalfields Ltd., Ρ.Ο.- Phusro Bazar, P.S. Bermo, District- Bokaro ......Opposite parties -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate For the Opposite parties : Mr. A.K.Das, Advocate Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocate -- 05/16.01.2026 It has been informed that the order has been complied in view of the fact that the petitioner has been reinstated in service; as such, no contempt is made out. 2. Accordingly, the instant contempt application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 16th January, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 20/01/2026