Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11511 (DEL)

KRISHAN @ VISHAL v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

BAIL APPLN./1841/2026 · 2026-07-09

Prateek Jalan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BAIL APPLN. 1841/2026 $~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1841/2026 KRISHAN @ VISHAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Neha Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivstava, APP Insp. Somvir Singh & Insp. Anand, PS Vikaspuri. Ms. Nimmi Sinha & Ms. Sarita Kumari, Advocates for Complainant. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 09.07.2026 1. By way of the present application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 512/2024 dated 16.10.2024, registered at Police Station Vikaspuri, District West, Delhi, under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, submits that the complainant has not yet been examined before the learned Trial Court. He further submits that the other material witnesses are also yet to be examined. 3. In view of the aforesaid, Ms. Neha Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:12:12 BAIL APPLN. 1841/2026 this stage, without prejudice to the applicant’s right to approach the learned Sessions Court at the appropriate stage, in accordance with law. 4. The bail application, alongwith pending applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the above submission. 5. It is, however, clarified that, in the event of any inordinate delay in the examination of the complainant or the other material witnesses, the applicant shall be at liberty to approach the learned Sessions Court in this regard. Any such application, if filed, shall be considered by the learned Sessions Court on its own merits, in accordance with law. 6. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case or on any application that may be filed by the applicant hereafter, which shall be considered by the appropriate Court on its own merits, in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 9, 2026 ‘pv’/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:12:12