IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 934/2026 Decided on: 04.06.2026 Shakuntla …..Petitioner Versus CSKHPKV ......Respondent ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Arun Rana, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record a copy of office order dated 27.11.2025 fixing petitioner’s revised pay pursuant to the directions issued in Shakuntla Vs. CSKHPKV2 . 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner though admits the above fact, however, raises a grievance that the petitioner has still not been paid pension. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that consequent upon issuance of office order dated 27.11.2025, the petitioner has become entitled to pension and that the respondent shall process her case & ensure release of admissible pension along with all 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 CWP No. 8100/2024 decided on 17.03.2025 2 due and admissible arrears within four weeks, i.e. on or before 06.07.2026. Taking note of above office order dated 27.11.2025 as also the assurance extended on behalf of the respondent through its learned counsel that the admissible pension along with pension arrears, if any, shall be released to the petitioner within four weeks, i.e. on or before 06.07.2026, the present petition stands disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for redressal of her surviving grievance(s), if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge June 04, 2026 (rohit)