Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11504 (PNJ)

GEETA THAMAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/5657/2026 · 2026-03-12

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 123 CWP-5657-2026 Date of Decision: 12.03.2026 GEETA THAMAN AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Shaurya Khanna, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Akshit Pathania, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 23.02.2026 the following order was passed by this Court:- “Counsel for the petitioners asserts that an application for registration of the conveyance deed submitted by the petitioner stands rejected as is evident from online status, Annexure P6 without passing a speaking order. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon official respondents. On asking of Court, Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of respondents. On his request, list on 12.03.2026. In the meanwhile, the competent authority shall hear the petitioners and pass a reasoned order on the application, if not done so far.” DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.12 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-5657-2026 -2- 2. Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Yash Kumar, Assistant o/o FCR Haryana, Chandigarh and Mr. Deepak, Staff Tehsil, Sohna submits that the conveyance deed would be registered within two weeks from today. 3. Faced with aforesaid statement, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the petition. 4. Disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 12, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.12 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document