Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11504 (KAR)

SMT VIDYALEKHA v. CHANDRASHEKAR H P

MFA/7782/2025 · 2026-02-11

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7782 OF 2025 BETWEEN SMT. VIDYALEKHA W/O CHANDRASHEKAR H.P., AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS NOW RESIDENT OF JAMBEKOPPA VILLAGE KASPADI, SAGAR TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …..Appellant s (By Sriyuths. Monica Patil and Ashmitha Patil, Advocates) AND CHANDRASHEKAR H.P S/O. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT HEBBODI VILLAGE ANANDAPURA POST SAGAR TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …….. Respondent This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S.47 of Guardians and Wards Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated MFA.No.7782/2025 ------------------------- 2 30.07.2024 passed in G and WC.No.14/2021 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sagar, dismissing the petition filed U/S.7 and 12 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections. Failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated.11.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE