Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11501 (JHR)

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD THROUGH ITS DEPUTY MANAGER v. PRAMILA DEVI

MA/74/2024 · 2026-03-14

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7368 AWARD BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT (PHYSICAL) DATED 14.03.2026 (Held at JHARKHAND HIGH COURT) (Organized by High Court Legal Services Committee under Section 19, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act). MA No.74 of 2024 Petitioner(s)/ Appellant(s):- The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Jain Petrol Pump, Hazaribag, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribag, District Hazaribag through its Deputy Manager, T.P. Hub, having its office at Prabodh Tower, S.N. Ganguly Road, P.S. Kotwali, P.O. and District Ranchi. Versus Respondent/O.P.(s): 1. Pramila Devi, Wife of Late Nageshwar Vishwakarma 2. Priti Kumari Wife of Late Sunil Kumar Vishwakarma 3. Shreya Kumari, Daughter of Late Sunil Kumar Vishwakarma 4. Laxmi Kumari, Daughter of Late Nageshwar Vishwakarma 5. Anil Kumar Vishwakarma, Son of Late Nageshwar Vishwakarma 6. Ashok Kumar Singh, Son of Adiaya Singh Present:- Name of the Hon’ble Judge:- Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary Name of Advocate Member: Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate For the Appellant Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate AWARD This matter has been notified to be taken up in the National Lok Adalat. Mr. Anil Kumar Vishwakarma is present from the side of the claimants. Mr. Alok Lal, the learned counsel appears from the side of appellant-the Oriental Insurance company. It has been jointly submitted that the matter has been settled. The settle- ment report is on record. This Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Pre-National Lok Adalat Settlement dated 27.02.2026. The Pre-National Lok Adalat Settlement dated 27.02.2026 is directed to form part of this settlement order and at the time of issuance of certified copy of this order, 2026:JHHC:7368 a copy of the mediation report be also furnished by the office along with the cer- tified copy of the order. It has been also been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the statutory amount deposited by the appellant before this Court be re- funded to the appellant to which the respondents have no objection. The statutory amount deposited by the Insurance Company be refunded to the Insurance Company by the office. ..................................... ................................. Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant Respondent/O.P. ………………………….. ……………………….. Sig. of Hon’ble Judge Sign. Of Advocate Member (Seal of HCLSC)