1 / 2 2026:CGHC:697 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8 of 2026 • Suman Yadav D/o Shri S.B. Yadav, Aged About 40 Years R/o Jarhagarh Panchwati Gali, Mangalam Bhawan, Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 3. The Civil Surgeon, District Hospital, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4. The Chairman, Transfer Coordination Committee, General Administration Department (Room-6) Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Krishna Kumar Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 06/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/ order, thereby setting-aside/ quashing the impugned order dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure P-1) so far it relates to petitioner and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to continue at her present place of posting. 10.2 That, any other relief/ order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is holding post of Medical Lab Technologist and was posted at District Hospital, Ambikapur. She was transferred from District Hospital, Ambikapur to Community Health Center, Manendragarh vide order dated 30.06.2025. Against the order of transfer, petitioner submitted a representation on 08.07.2025 before the Committee constituted under the Transfer Policy, however, till date the representation submitted by petitioner has not been considered and no orders has been passed. Therefore, direction be issued to the concerned committee under the Transfer Policy to take decision on the application/ representation within specified time frame. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties as also considering Annexure P-6, copy of representation, wherein it also bears seal of concerned office of 08.07.2025, without commenting anything on the claim of petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of with a direction to Respondent No. 4 to consider and decide the application of petitioner against her transfer, if already not decided, in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a further period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of order passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE