Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11497 (GAU)

RUPAMONI CHETIA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2387/2026 · 2026-07-30

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010148532026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2387/2026 RUPAMONI CHETIA DAUGHTER OF CHITRADHAR CHETIA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. RANGALI PATHER VIA NAHARKATIA, P.S. NAHARKATIA, DISTRICT DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN-786610. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019. 3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER DIBRUGARH DISTRICT DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786001. 4:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER JOYPUR EDUCATION BLOCK DISTRICT DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786610 Advocate for the Petitioner : A. H. AHMED, MS D DUTTA,MR. S B LASKAR,MR. H A LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, Page No.# 2/4 Linked Case : WP(C)/5180/2025 RUPAMONI CHETIA D/O- CHITRADHAR CHETIA VILL. AND P.O. RANGALI PATHER VIA NAHARKATIA P.S. NAHARKATIA DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786610. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER DIBRUGARH DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786001. 4:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER JOYPUR EDUCATION BLOCK DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786610. ------------ Advocate for : MR. S B LASKAR Advocate for : SC ELEM. EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 31.07.2026 Heard Mr. S.B Laskar, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. N Phukan, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed seeking corrections of the order dated 29.05.2026 passed in W.P(C) No. 5180/2025. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant has pointed out the corrections which are required in the said order. 4. The learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education for the respondents does not object to the same. 5. It is seen that this corrections will not materially alter the order. Rather these corrections are essentially corrections of syntax. 6. Accordingly, the following corrections are made in the order dated 29.05.2026 passed in W.P(C) No. 5180/2025: (i) The 3rd paragraph of Page No. 10 of the interlocutory application, the word “Secondary Education Department” be read as “Elementary Education Department”; (ii) The 4th paragraph at Page-10 of the interlocutory application, the “Director of Secondary Education” be read as “Director of Elementary Education”; (iii) The 2nd paragraph of the Page-11 of the interlocutory application, the “Inspector of Schools” be read as “District Elementary Education Officer, Dibrugarh” and the “Director of Secondary Education” be read as “Director of Elementary Education”; and (iv) The 4th paragraph of page 11 of the interlocutory application is also the Page No.# 4/4 “Director of Secondary Education” be read as “Director of Elementary Education”. 7. This order be read together with the order dated 29.05.2026 passed in W.P(C) No. 5180/2025. 8. The interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant