Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11494 (JHR)

RAM KRISHNA KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/739/2026 · 2026-02-05

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3097 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 739 of 2026 Ram Krishna Kumar, age about 40, Son of Arvind Kumar Sharma, Resident of Plot No. E2, Center Market, Sector 2/D, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S.- Bokaro Steel City, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand (827001). ....... Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand having office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, District-Bokaro. 4. Additional Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, District- Bokaro. 5. Binod Bihari Koylanchal University, Dhanbad through its Registrar having office at Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. 6. Vice-Chancellor, Binod Bihari Mahto Koyalanchal University, having his office at Sardar Patel Nagar, Dhanbad P.O. Dhanbad, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand 7. Controller of Examinations, Binod Bihari Koylanchal University, Dhanbad, having office at Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad 8. National Council for Teachers Education through its Regional Director, East Regional Committee, (NCTE) G-7, Sector-10, Dwarka, P.O. and P.S. Dwarka, Delhi 9.The Principal, Swami Sahjanand Sarswati B.Ed. College having its office Sector VIII, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. Sector-IX, P.S. Sector-IV, District- Bokaro. .......... Respondents(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Alok Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Abhishek, Advocate For the Resp.-NCTE : Mrs. Khushboo Kataruka, Advocate Ms. Kumari Ruchika, Advocate For the Resp.- University : Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. P.C. Sinha, A.C to G.A.-III 02/05.02.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission to withdraw the present writ petition to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents are present and have no objection to the said prayer. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 05.02.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded ____/____/2026