Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11486 (AP)

NALLADIMME GURAVAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/27089/2026 · 2026-09-20

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010497872026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27089/2026 Between: 1. NALLADIMME GURAVAMMA, A ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, s ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M S S SWAYAM PRAKASH BABU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of respondents, particularly the respondent No.4, in interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.300/2A of Thokapalli Village, Peddaraveedu Mandal, Prakasam District (now Markapur District), as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Chandra Sekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appeared for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a DKT Patta was granted in favour of the petitioner in respect of the aforementioned extent vide Proceedings in R.Dis.349/D/A/R/1384 dated 03.05.1985 and thereafter, the Record of Rights were updated. The Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed were issued in favour of the petitioner. Since then, the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the subject land. (a) Be that as it may, on 16.09.2026, respondent No. 4, along with staff, visited the land and demanded that the petitioner to vacate the subject land. In support of the petitioner’s claim, the D-form patta, Pattadar Pass Book and Adangal were filed as Exs.P1 to P3. 4. Sri Chandra Sekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that the respondent authorities are not interfering with the petitioner’s possession of the aforementioned property. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of learned counsel appearing on either side, directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.300/2A of Thokapalli Village, Peddaraveedu Mandal, Prakasam District (now Markapur District), without following due procedure of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 21.09.2026 TVN/SKB 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27089 of 2026 Date: 21.09.2026 TVN