Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11482 (CAL)

SANKAR KUILYA AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/7/2026 · 2026-01-27

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.04.2026 Court No.28 Item No.5 ssi CRM (A) 7 of 2026 IA No: CRAN 1 of 2026 In Re: - An application for modification/alteration of the order dated January 27, 2026. And In the matter of: Sankar Kuilya and others. …. Petitioners. Ms. Sananda Bhattacharyya …for the petitioners Mr. Amanul Islam …for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that by an order dated 27.01.2026 passed in CRM (A) 7 of 2026, the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail and were directed to surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from this date. However, due to some ailments of the petitioners and lack of communication between the petitioners and their learned counsel, they could not surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court in time. It is prayed that, in the interest of justice, the time to surrender be extended. Heard the learned counsel for the State. It appears that due to some unforeseen circumstances, the petitioners could not surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail as directed in this Court’s earlier order granting anticipatory bail. 2 In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the time to surrender and pray for bail before the learned jurisdictional Court is extended by three more weeks from date. The rest of the order shall remain the same. With these observations and directions, the application for relaxation and/or modification of order of anticipatory bail is disposed of. Accordingly, CRAN 1 of 2026 is disposed of. (Jay Sengupta, J.)