Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11481 (CAL)

SOUGATA ADHIKARY v. MOUSUMI MONDAL AND ORS.

MAT/2161/2025 · 2026-02-03

Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, Tapabrata Chakraborty

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

03.02.2026 Item No.18 Court No.11 KCP MAT 2161 of 2025 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2026 with IA No. CAN 2 of 2026 Sougata Adhikary - Versus - Mousumi Mondal & Ors. Mr. Anindya Lahiri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arkadipta Sengupta Mr. Anish Chakraborty Ms. Ankita Ghosh …for the appellant/applicant Mr. Ashim Kr. Ganguly Mr. Tarak Karan …. For the State Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv. (V/C) Mr. Firdous Samim Ms. Gopa Biswas Mr. Hasanuz Zaman Molla Mr. Naman Shah Mr. Ayush Majumdar Ms. Brinta Dutta …. For the respondents in CAN 1 of 2026 & CAN 2 of 2026 Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh (V/C) …for the W.B.C.S.S.C. Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya. …for the W.B.B.S.E. Affidavit-of-service, as filed, be kept on record. On the prayer of Mr. Lahiri, learned senior advocate appearing for the applicant, the application for leave to appeal being CAN 2 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate application in the pending writ petition before the learned single Judge. 2 Consequently, the appeal and the other connected application are also dismissed. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)