MAHAVIR SINGH S/O SHRI NAVAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3324/2020 · 2026-04-01
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1148 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1148 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13528] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3324/2020 Mahavir Singh S/o Shri Naval Singh, R/o Village Badwas Kasot, Deeg Distt. Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Singh, with Mr. Sandeep Kumar on behalf of Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 01/04/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 15.06.2020, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deeg, District Bharatpur in the proceedings arising out FIR No. 242/2020 registered with the Police Station Deeg, District Bharatpur, by which the application submitted by the petitioner-complainant for constitution of Medical Board for re-examination of the injuries sustained by the injured Mahavir Singh, Jai Hind and Naval Singh has been rejected.
2. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order the petitioner submitted a revision petition before the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Deeg, District Bharatpur, however, the same was also rejected vide impugned order dated 04.07.2020. Hence, the
[2026:RJ-JP:13528] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3324/2020] petitioner has approached this Court challenging both the aforementioned orders by way of filing the instant petition.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Doctor, who examined the injured Mahavir Singh, Jai Hind and Naval Singh has not examined the injuries sustained by them in a proper manner, hence, a fresh Medical Board is required to be constituted for re-examination of their injuries in order to ascertain the truth with regard to the actual injuries sustained by them and appropriate orders are required to be passed.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer made in the petition.
5. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
6. Perusal of the record indicates that the incident occurred on 17.04.2020 for which an FIR No. 242/2020 was registered with the Police Station Deeg, District Bharatpur on 19.04.2020. The injured persons, were taken to the Government Hospital, where the Medical Officer examined the injured Mahavir Singh, Jai Hind, Naval Singh and Bhagwati and prepared their medical reports. The Medical Officer is an expert in the field who has given his report on the basis of the injury sustained by the injured persons and no doubt can be raised on the opinion of such an expert.
7. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by the complainant-petitioner was rejected by the Court below by passing the order impugned which has been further upheld by the Revisional Court.
8. This Court finds no error in the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below and the same do not require any
[2026:RJ-JP:13528] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3324/2020] interference of this Court. Accordingly, this Court does not finds any merit and substance in the instant petition and the same is liable to be and is hereby dismissed.
9. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/13