1 2026:CGHC:19490 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1965 of 2025 1 - Dr. Suresh Chandra Tiwari S/o Late Shri Lallan Tiwari Aged About 53 Years R/o Kamla Nehru College, Police Station City Kotwali, Korba District- Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Department Of Higher Education Government Of Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Block-3, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Director (Finance), Directorate, Higher Education Government Of Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - University Grants Commission (Ugc) Through Its Secretary Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, New Delhi 5 - Kamala Nehru College Korba Through Its Principal, Kamala Nehru College, Korba, District- Korba Chhattisgarh 6 - Secretary Governing Body, Kamala Nehru College, Korba, Kamala Nehru College, Korba, District- Korba Chhattisgarh 7 - Secretary Kamala Nehru Mahavidyalaya Committee, Korba, District- Korba Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Advocate For State/Respondents No. : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Govt. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.04.29 18:23:36 +0530 2 1 to 3 Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Ms. Shreya, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate For Respondents No. 5 to 7: Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 27/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondents No.5 to 7 would submits that petitioner is having alternate efficacious remedy available under law and therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable. He also submits that in one of the petition filed against the respondents No.5 to 7, Coordinate Bench of this Court has taken view that as petitioner is having alternate officious remedy to approach competent forum under Section of 38 of the College Code in WPS No.2398/2023 and connected matters. After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail other remedy available under the law. 2. Learned counsel for the respective respondents have not opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi