APHC010230052016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9043 OF 2016 Between: 1. CH.PARVATHI, W/o Ramanjaneyulu, age about age 49 years, Occ: Prawn Culture, R/o Mahalakshmipuram, H/o China Kapavaram Village, Akivedu Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. APEPDCL VSP 3, Corporate Office at Visakhapatnam. 2. The Superintending Engineer/Operations, Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Co.Ltd., Eluru, West Godavari District. 3. The Divisional Engineer/Operation, Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Co.Ltd., Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. 4. The Assistant Divisional Engineer Operation, Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Co.Ltd., Akivedu, West Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing the proceedings vide letter No.ADE/ OSD/AKVDK/F 2 DOC TE/MP/D.No.1573/16, dated 08-02-2016, is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 11451 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings of the 4th respondent vide No.ADE/OSD/AKVDK/F DOC TE/MP/ D.No.1573/16, dated 08-02-2016, pending disposal of main Writ Petition IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 4977 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 21.03.2016 in WPMP No. 11451 of 2016 in WP No. 9043 of 2016 Counsel for the Petitioner: K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9043 OF 2016 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 23.09.2026 BSP 4 03 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9043 OF 2016 23.09.2026 BSP