M/S MASTER (INDIA) BREWING COMPANY AND ANR v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/17/2020 · 2026-07-28
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11477 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11477 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010320122019
2026:GAU-AS:10462
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/17/2020 M/S MASTER (INDIA) BREWING COMPANY AND ANR A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT EXPRESS COMPLEX, DR. B. BOROOAH ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-781007, REP BY ONE OF ITS PARTNER SHRI RAJESH JALAN 2: RAJESH KUMAR JALAN S/O SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN JALAN R/O HOUSE NO. 17 GAYATRI KUNJ BYE LANE NO. 2 USHA NAGAR CHITRALEKHA LANE DISPUR SUPER MARKET GUWAHATI-78100 VERSUS PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 6 ORS A NATIONAL BANK HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT PLOT NO. 4, SECTOR 10 DWARKA NEW DELHI-110075, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2:PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK GUWAHATI CIRCLE NILGIRI MANSION BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-781005 REP. BY THE CIRCLE HEAD 3:THE CHIEF MANAGER CENTRALIZED LOAN PROCESSING CENTRE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK NILGIRI MANSION BHANGAGARH
Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI-781005 4:THE CHIEF MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ZOO ROAD BRANCH MANIK NAGAR GUWAHATI-781006 5:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (CREDIT) STATE BANK OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE P.B. NO. 12 NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI-400021 6:THE BRANCH MANAGER ICD AMINGAON BRANCH STATE BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI-781031 7:HDFC BANK GUWAHATI BRANCH G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-78100 For the Petitioner(s) : None appears
For the Respondent(s) : XXXX
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
29.07.2026
None appears on behalf of the Petitioners on call.
2. It is seen that the Petitioners did not appear on the earlier
Page No.# 3/3 occasion and have also not taken any steps, as would be evident from the order of the Lawazima Court. It, therefore, appears that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. The interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant