Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11469 (ALL)

ARSHAD ALI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/39393/2026 · 2026-09-28

Indrajeet Shukla, J J Munir

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39393 of 2026 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. This petition has been filed seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect the lives and properties of the petitioner and his family from rowdy elements belonging to the ruling party, who are adamant to falsely implicate the petitioner in a criminal case on account of being members of the minority community. The relief is very vaguely worded and can hardly be granted for that reason alone. At this stage, Mr. P.K.Shahi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel brings to our notice the fact that the Case Crime No. 143 of 2026 under Section 103(1) and 3(5) B.N.S. Police Station Bhaduani, District Deoria has been registered where the petitioner though not named in the FIR has an application given by the mother of the deceased, victim of the crime saying that the petitioner had threatened the deceased with death and has assigned him the role of a conspirator. We are, therefore, of opinion that while we cannot grant any relief to the petitioner on the basis of the vague prayer made before us, it is open to the petitioner to question the FIR by moving an appropriate writ petition before the Bench holding criminal roaster. So far as this petition is concerned, we are not inclined to interfere. It is accordingly dismissed. September 29, 2026 Pratima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lal Behari Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (J.J. Munir,J.) Arshad Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad