21-WP-220-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 220 OF 2024 Ebsy Tamil Raj & Ors. .....Petitioners Versus Arihant Realtors & Ors. .....Respondents ..... Mr. Santosh Sanjkar a/w Ms. Shilpa Hadwale, for the Petitioners. Mr. Amrut Joshi a/w Mr. Suraj Iyer a/w Mr. Mani Thevar, Mr. Anas Dhorajiwala i/b Ganesh & Co., for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Abhijit Aher i/b Ms. Tanaya Goswami for the Respondent – A.G.R.C. Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal for the Respondent No.5 – S.R.A. ..… CORAM : M. S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.:- 1. So far as the relief in terms of prayer clause (a) is concerned, the petitioner now can approach to the Committee constituted in terms of the Directions of this Court in the case of Sagar Vijay Korgaonkar & Ors. V/s The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors. dated 28th January, 2026 in Writ Wakodikar 1/2 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2026.09.28 11:19:11 +0530 21-WP-220-2024.doc Petition No. 7443 of 2023 alongwith Interim Application No. 17577 of 2023 in Writ Petition No. 7443 of 2023. 2. If such an application is filed, we request the concerned authority to expeditiously decide the application regarding outstanding transit rent for individual petitioners expeditiously. 3. So far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, it is open for the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent No.6 for taking appropriate actions against the illegal shops as alleged. 4. If such representation is made giving necessary details, respondent No.6 to look into the representation and to take appropriate action expeditiously, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity to the aggrieved persons, including the petitioner. 5. Keeping all contentions open, petition is disposed of accordingly. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Wakodikar 2/2