Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11463 (RAJ)

SHAHANAZ BAIG v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18444/2026 · 2026-08-10

Yogendra Kumar Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:38079] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18444/2026 CNR: RJHC010781912026 | URN: CW / 31851U / 2026 Shahanaz Baig D/o Shri Kamruddin Khan, Aged About 44 Years, R/o E-75 Ambawadi Koishalkishore Marg Jhothwara Road Jaipur Raj. Presently Posted As Vice Principal ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Dept. Of Education Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur Raj. 2. The Director, Secondary Education Bikaner Dist. Bikaner Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. ML Deora For Respondent(s) : Mr. NK Mehta, Dy. G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 10/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Present writ Petition is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in Manoj Khandelwal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B.C.W.P. No. 7283/2014 decided on 16.07.2024 at Jaipur Bench, petitioner may be permitted to file a representation within a period of one week form today before the respondent/s which may be directed to be decided expeditiously within a period of four weeks. 2. In view of the submissions made, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to file a representation in the light of aforesaid decision before the respondent/s for ventilating the grievance within a period of one week from today and the same shall be decided within a period of [2026:RJ-JP:38079] (2 of 2) [CW-18444/2026] four weeks thereafter, by passing a speaking order strictly in accordance with law. 3. The stay application as well as other pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 101/SN Lohra