APHC010468992014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 20405/2014 Between: 1. MADDALA APPA RAO, S/O.LATE APPALA NAIDU, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O.NANDAGIRI NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM,VISAKHAPATNAM 2. MADDALA VENKATA APPA RAO, S/O.LATE APPALA NAIDU, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O.NANDAGIRI NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM,VISAKHAPATNAM 3. MADDALA RAMA MURTHY S/O.LATE APPALA NAIDU, 4. BODDETI NAVA PRASAD, S/O.LATE VENKAT RAO, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.45-46-22/5, SRINIVASA NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM 5. BODDETI KRISHNA RAMA RAJU, S/O.LATE VENKAT RAO, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.45-46-22/5, SRINIVASA NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM 6. MADDALA SRININVASA RAO, S/O.LATE VENKATARAMANA, R/O.D.NO.44-14-34/1, GAVARA THATHICHETLAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM 7. MADDALA MEGHA DAKSHINA MURTHY, S/O.LATE VENKATARAMANA, R/O.D.NO.44-14-34/1, GAVARA THATHICHETLAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM 8. RAJASIRI APPA RAO, S/O.APPA RAO,, R/O.FLAT NO.45-46-22, NANGAGIRI N AGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM 2 VS,J W.P.No.20405 of 2014 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,HYDERABAD 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM 3. THE TAHSILDAR URBAN MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM 4. THE SPECIAL OFFICER URBAN LAND CEILING, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners fro the land admeasuring 560 sq.yds in Sy.No.40P known as Godavari Manyam situated at Dondaparthy , Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principels of natural justice and consequently declare that the erection of boards by the official respondents is not binding on the petitioners as it is a private land IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 25597 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent 2 to 4 not to dispossess the petitioners from the land admeasuring 560.sq.yds in Sy.No.40P known as Godavari Manyam situated at Dondaparthy, Visakhapatnam ,Visakhapatnam District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M V HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 3 VS,J W.P.No.20405 of 2014 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 4 VS,J W.P.No.20405 of 2014 ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 08.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, as such, the matter was posted to 15.09.2026. Even on 15.09.2026, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioners, hence, the matter was directed to be posted on 22.09.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 22.09.2026 Gss