[2026:RJ-JP:13586] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4554/2026 Ranjeet @ Mukesh Son Of Hariram, Resident Of Navapura Thana Uniyara, District Tonk At Present Naya Ganv Thana Mothpur, District Baran, At Present Hanuman Mandir Ke Pass, Hanuman Basti, Thana Dadabari, Kota City. At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota. ----Accused-Applicant Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Upadhaya Mr. Mirza Shoaib Ur Rehman Ms. Saziya Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 01/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 173/2025 registered at Police Station Kunadi, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Section(s) 331(4), 305(a) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is behind the bars since 11.07.2025. He also submits that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. He further submits that co-accused persons namely Bhanu @ Ayush and Durgashankar have already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself. He further submits that the accused- petitioner is bailed out in other criminal cases instituted against [2026:RJ-JP:13586] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4554/2026] him and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that charge-sheet has already been filed; the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 11.07.2025; co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Ranjeet @ Mukesh Son of Hariram is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he [2026:RJ-JP:13586] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4554/2026] shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /66