HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14691 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Shri Sunil Kumar, Advocate along with Shri Veerendra Kumar Gautam, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that his son is having 50% disability in the form of intellectual disability and mental disability; and by placing reliance on Clause 5(4) of the Transfer Policy date 05.05.2026, it has been argued that since the petitioner has not been given the reliving order as on date, his application be accorded compassionate consideration, in light of the said clause. He has also placed reliance upon a decision of this Court dated 23.06.2026 in the case of Shailendra Vikram vs. State of U.P. and others (Writ-A No.9244 of 2026), wherein under similar circumstances this Court by placing reliance upon a Division Bench decision of this Court and a decision of the Apex Court that, an employee has a legitimate expectation that the advantages which flows from the Government Order, would be made available to the employee; and accordingly the effect of the transfer policy was considered to be binding on the State Government. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that due consideration shall be given to the application of the petitioner, under the transfer policy dated 05.05.2026. 4. In view of the aforesaid, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the present writ petition pending and on the consent of the parties the writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar, Veerendra Kumar Goutam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sanjeev Kumar Arya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petition is being decided at the admissions stage itself by providing that in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation for redressal of his grievance along with the certified copy of this order within 7 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no. 2 by passing a reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within the further period of two months from the date of receiving of the said representation before him. 5. However, it is provided that till the decision of the Directorate of Training, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, the impugned transfer order dated 29.05.2026, shall not be given effect. 6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off. September 29, 2026 S.Prakash WRIA No. 14691 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad