APHC010050042014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9557 OF 2014 Between: 1. M/s.Sea Pearls Industries,, Represented by its Managing Partner J.Chandra Sekhar Reddy S/o.J.Pulla Reddy aged about 36 years, R/o.Nunna. Vijayawada (Rural), Krishna District ...Petitioner AND 1. Chairman and Managing Director, A.P.Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd, Tirupathi, Chittoor District 2. The Chief Engineer, APSPDCL, Vijayawada. 3. The Superintending Engineer, (Operation) Vijayawada. 4. The Divisional Engineer Operations, Gunadala. Vijayawada. 5. The Assistant Divisional Engineer Operations, Gunadala, Vijayawada. 6. The Senior Accounts Officer, Circle Office, APSPDCL, Vijayawada ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to restore power connection to SC 2 No_VJA/928, HT Category -I, by duly collecting the usual energy charges by declaring the Provisional Assessment order issued by the 5th respondent in his Lr.No_ADE/OSD/GDL/SubEr/13/D.No.2534/2013-14 dated 24-3-2014, calculating the energy charges as if the petitioner firm utilized the same un- authroisedly as illegal and arbitrary IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 11993 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to restore the power connection to SC No.VJA 928 HT Category -I forthwith pending Writ Petition IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 32808 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of (66) days in Resubmission of file in the above W.V.M.P.Sr.No. 98740 of 2014 in W.P.No. 9557 Of 2014 IA NO: 5 OF 2014(WVMP 98740 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Y.NAGI REDDY (APSPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:P VINOD KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents:V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:V V SATISH The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9557 OF 2014 ORDER: No representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the docket order reveals that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last occasion i.e., on 19.09.2026. Therefore, on 19.09.2026, the matter is directed to be listed on 23.09.2026, finally. Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case. 3. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that the subject electricity service connection was stopped long back and the same is not functioning since February-2018. But so far the arrears to be payable by the petitioner are not paid to the respondents. 4. Since the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non- prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 23.09.2026 BSP 5 11 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9557 OF 2014 23.09.2026 BSP