TUSHAR MISHRA @ SHOMYA MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2493/2026 · 2026-04-28
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11445 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11445 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:12486] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 2493 of 2026
Tushar Mishra @ Shomya Mishra, aged about 25 years, S/O – Raj Kumar Mishra, R/O Marar, P.O. + P.S. + District Ramgarh, State- Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. H.K.Shikarwar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl.. PP
03 / 28.04.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No. 233 of 2025, S.T no 05 of 2026 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 111 (2) (1), 111(4), 61 (2) (a) of B.NS r/w 25 (1-B) (a), 26, 25(6), 25(7) and section- 35 of Arms Act.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of a gang of criminals, headed by Rahul Dubey and he indulged in firing in railway siding check post and the petitioner led to recovery of two pistols with magazines and seven live cartridges and empty magazines. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 25.09.2025 , as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is then submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or victim or
their family members in any manner during trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted on bail by this court vide order dated 07.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 760 of 2026 hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No. 233 of 2025, S.T no 05 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or the victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 28.04.2026
Smita/-