Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11444 (JHR)

MANI BHUSHAN PATHAK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./133/2026 · 2026-01-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1091 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 133 of 2026 ---- Mani Bhushan Pathak aged about 29 years son of Arun Pathak resident of Bhatiya Basti Near Gandhi College, PO and PS Adityapur, District Seraikella (Kharsawan).... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Arbind Kumar Choudhary,Advocate For the State :- Mr. V.K. Vshishtha, Advocate ---- 2/15.01.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chandil PS Case No.60 of 2025, for offence registered under sections 316(2), 318(4), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chandil. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is one of the partner in the business of making trolley and there is an agreement between Shubham Kumar and the informant for supply of trolley and in terms of the agreement, the trolley has been supplied, however, the allegations are made that the trolley has not been supplied within time. He next submits that the gate pass of the factory wherefrom the trolley has been taken out has been annexed with the petition. He also submits that one of the partner has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.7273 of 2025. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that 2026:JHHC:1091 2 allegations are there of not supplying the trolley. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there was an agreement of supply of trolley. Annexure-2 is the certificate, copy of GST certificate and gate pass of the factory wherefrom trolley has been taken out and further the matter is arising out of an agreement and the co-accused person has been granted anticipatory bail as aforesaid, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner. 6. Accordingly, petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within four weeks from today, and in event of his surrender/arrest, petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chandil, in connection with Chandil PS Case No.60 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 15.01.2026 SI/