907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 250 OF 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 250 OF 2010 IN WP/1714/2007 Vithal Krishnanath Dongre And 45 Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, A.G.P. for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1) This contempt petition is filed in the year 2010. Lastly, it came on board in the year 2011. Thereafter, the contempt petition has not been circulated. 2) In the order under contempt, the direction was to decide the application for rental compensation. 3) The report of the Resource Personnel of this Court dated 16.09.2026 shows that there were other contempt petitions arising out of the same order, which are disposed of by this Court as the order is complied with by deciding the representation and paying the rental compensation. Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:43496 907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 250 OF 2010 4) It is presumed that along with the other contempt petitions, the order under contempt in this petition also must have been complied with. 5) In view of the same, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 2 of 2