1 2026:CGHC:21002 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 2984 of 2026 Jogi Singh Soni S/o Kuldeep Singh Soni Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 26, Santara Badi, Near Sahu Dairy, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station Supela, District – Durg (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Devendra Kumar Swarnkar, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 05.05.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 191/2026, registered at Police Station – Supela, District – Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 337, 111(4) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS. 2. The case of the prosecution, is that the complainant made complaint before the Police Station concerned that the applicant and other co- accused persons have made forged agreement relating to the Khasra No. 144/7 and 144/3 belonging to the land of Sandeep Jain and Anurag Jain and for the purpose of selling the said land one agreement has been prepared and to take Rs. 55,00,000/- from many persons, and the allegations against the accused persons are also that they are RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 made forged Adhaar Card and PEN Card relating to the said land and open the passbook at ICIC Bank and also taken the money. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and there are 4 criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. The applicant is in jail since 06.02.2026 and trial is likely to take quite long time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there are 4 criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, and the applicant is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that there are 4 criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant, the applicant is in jail since 06.02.2026 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application. 7. Let applicant, Jogi Singh Soni, involved in Crime No. 191/2026, registered at Police Station – Supela, District – Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 337, 111(4) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS, be released on bail on his furnishing a 3 personal bond with two local sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar